In a time when business corruption has trashed our economy and polluted our government, who doesn't want to see a movie that sends up the businessmen responsible? The Informant! (based on Kurt Eichenwald's non-fiction book of the same name) tells the story of Decatur-based agro-conglomerate Archer Daniels Midland. In particular, it tells of Mark Whitacre, their unassuming President of BioProducts, and his seemingly noble attempt to out the agribusiness practice of illegal price fixing.
Matt Damon's physical transformation (he gained 30 lbs. to play the role of Whitacre), combined with an outstanding performance, is reminiscent of DeNiro's for Raging Bull. The rest of the cast is also spot on, led by Scott Bakula (one of my favorites) and about a million comics – Joel McHale, Tom Papa, Paul F. Tompkins, Patton Oswalt, and others were cast in roles both large and small for the film.
For all the comedians taking part, is the final product funny? Yes. It's actually very funny, though most laughable (in every sense) is Damon's Whitacre, especially during his scores of non-sequitur voiceovers, which illlustrate that this man is rarely concentrating on even the most important things that occur aroung him. The movie excels at making this story more amusing that sad, though it is most certainly both. By highlighting the assinine and confusing details of this true story, the film creates the same sense of confusion in the viewer that everyone around Whitacre felt all the time.
Still, purposefully confusing is still confusing. It's hard to feel totally satisfied by a production that leaves key questions unanswered, and leaves everyone (except maybe Whitacre) guessing not until the last moment, but beyond the last moment, into the credits, and on the drive home. And these aren't questions that can be answered by a few hours of puzzling. It is doubtful that anyone knows exactly how the true story of the Informant goes.
The real Mark Whitacre is still alive. Perhaps, on his deathbed, he'll reveal a tell-all memoir that tells the tale of the real man and of the real corn industry. But at this point, I seriously doubt anyone will believe any of it.



The FBI does not appear to agree with the portrayal of Whitaker in the movie. They are everywhere in the media calling him a "national hero" and stating that the movie is not an accurate portrayal of Whitaker or the case. A few recent interviews and press conferences with FBI are shown below.
http://www.herald-review.com/entertainment/local/article_cc764865-6974-57da-bfcc-e0d095f7d40a.html
http://www.weartv.com/newsroom/top_stories/videos/wear_vid_4049.shtml
http://www.cnn.com/2009/BUSINESS/10/01/whitacre.informant/
http://www.pnj.com/article/20090923/NEWS01/909230326/1006
Posted by: Kevin Johnson | October 16, 2009 at 10:07 AM
That's really interesting, Kevin. I wonder if the movie portrayal of Whitacre is in line with Eichenwald's book. I guess I'll have to read it!
Posted by: Marissa Flaxbart | October 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Marissa, one can view in a recent Discovery Channel documentary which aired August 4, 2009 with several FBI agents and prosecutors who had a whole different opinion of the case than the movie. Starker differences of the same man could not exist between the movie portrayal and the Discovery documentary. The 3-minute trailer of Discovery Channel is shown at this link.
http://www.markwhitacre.com/discovery.html
Posted by: Kevin Johnson | October 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Did my earlier comment post?
Posted by: Floyd Perry | October 16, 2009 at 06:48 PM